data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
Both versions of the dynamic indications written in the teaching copies point to the use of the echo effect. The entry in FES, which, as it seems, defines a more distinct contrast, was written by Chopin most probably on a piano music rack, which is evidenced by a characteristically careless handwriting. Therefore, it would be an 'on-the-go' remark, aimed at stimulating the pupil to a more suggestive performance. The entry in FEJ suggests a subtler difference and was most probably addressed to a person with more advanced piano skills. In the main text – having faith in the performer's intuition – we give the indications of FES, since they are clearer.
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Annotations in teaching copies, Annotations in FES, Annotations in FEJ
notation: Verbal indications
Back to note