Issues : Errors of FC
b. 1-2
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 17, Prelude in A♭ major
..
Fontana overlooked the dynamic hairpins in FC (→GE). The notation of A does not specify the range of the marks, since bar 2 was not written out with notes. We adopt the natural interpretation of FE (→EE). category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , Errors of FC |
||||||
b. 16
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 17, Prelude in A♭ major
..
The overlooked accent is one of many oversights of Fontana in this Prelude – cf., e.g. b. 1-2 or 21. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of FC |
||||||
b. 19
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 17, Prelude in A♭ major
..
The version of FC (→GE) resulted from the copyist having overlooked d1 in the last chord in the bar. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of FC |
||||||
b. 19
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 17, Prelude in A♭ major
..
In A (→FC,FE) as well as in FCI there is no raising e to e. The obvious Chopin's inaccuracy was corrected in GE and EE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Errors of FC , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in FE |
||||||
b. 21
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 17, Prelude in A♭ major
..
In FC (→GE) the first c2 note is a dotted crotchet. The mistake was probably provoked by the complicated layout of this bar, in which the d1-f1 third of the 2nd L.H. quaver is written on the top stave next to the c1-g1 fifth of the bottom R.H. voice, thus creating an illusion of a third quaver filling c2 of the top R.H. voice. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors of FC , Errors repeated in GE |