The dashes marking the range of cresc. were misinterpreted in FC and GE; in turn, EE reproduced them inaccurately. The copyist, who did not notice dim. in b. 31, led the dashes until this very bar, since he was convinced that the dashes in the following bars mark the continuation of crescendo. The engraver of GE forgot the dashes on a new line of text. The engraver of EE probably considered the notation of FE to be inaccurate and led the dashes to the end of b. 28, which, actually, seems to be one of the acceptable interpretations of the notation of A (→FE).
Compare the passage in the sources»
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Errors in GE, Errors of FC
notation: Verbal indications