Issues : EE revisions
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 16, Prelude in B♭ minor
..
In A (→FC,FE) there is no before the 2nd semiquaver in the 2nd half of the bar (a2). The patent inaccuracy was corrected in GE and EE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in FE |
|||||
b. 12-13
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 16, Prelude in B♭ minor
..
In A (→FC,FE) there is no accidental before the 4th semiquaver in the 3rd group, which would result in f2, which is impossible in this context. The oversight of a cancelled alteration, frequently encountered in Chopin's music, was corrected in GE and EE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Errors of A , Errors repeated in FE |
|||||
b. 12-14
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 16, Prelude in B♭ minor
..
The missing slur running from the last L.H. quaver in b. 12 and two subsequent ones in b. 13-14 in EE is a patent mistake of the engraver of that edition. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , GE revisions , Errors of FC |
|||||
b. 19-21
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 16, Prelude in B♭ minor
..
Starting with the last quaver in bar 19, EE added additional slurs linking the pairs of the L.H. octaves. Similar arbitrary additions are not uncommon in Chopin's works published by Wessel. Similarly in the next bars. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
b. 22-23
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 16, Prelude in B♭ minor
..
The absence of fingering in FE (→EE) is probably a result of an oversight of the engraver of FE. The digit having been moved by one note in b. 22 is probably a mistake of the engraver of GE. That mistake was repeated in EE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in GE , Errors repeated in EE |