Issues : Errors in GE
b. 11
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 4, Prelude in E minor
..
The fact that the chord was not changed in the middle of the bar must be a mistake of the engraver of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
b. 22-23
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 4, Prelude in E minor
..
The missing dashes marking the range of smorzando is an inaccuracy of FE (→EE) and GE, quite frequent in Chopinesque first editions. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in GE , Inaccuracies in FC |
||||||||
b. 23-24
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 4, Prelude in E minor
..
The L.H. slur in A encompasses only the two minims in b. 24. The range of the slur in FC is not entirely clear; however, it seems to point at the final E1-E octave, which is how it was reproduced in GE1. A longer slur, probably under the influence of the R.H., is also present in FE (→EE). The absence of the slur in GE2 and CGS is an oversight. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in GE , Inaccuracies in FC |