Issues : Errors in FE
b. 10-12
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 4, Prelude in E minor
..
The longer slur of As is probably the initial version, concerning the crossed-out version of the melodic line in b. 10-11. It is indicated by a second slur between b. 11-12, which begins only just over the a1 crotchet, added (or left) as valid after corrections. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||
b. 17-18
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 4, Prelude in E minor
..
The high position of the L.H. chords and the resulting lack of space between the staves contributed to inaccuracies and mistakes in the reproduction of the hairpin – it was moved in FC (→GE, inaccurately) and overlooked in FE (→EE1). The mark in EE2 was added on the basis of GE1, overlooking its ending at the beginning of b. 18. In GE, there is a complete mark at the end of the line (in b. 17), in spite of the fact that b. 18 contains its ending in the form of a new mark – in times of Chopin, the contemporary, more accurate notation of such divided hairpins was not generally used yet. The absence of the mark in CGS is one of the arguments supporting the fact that the copy was prepared on the basis of FE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Scope of dynamic hairpins , Inaccuracies in FC , Hairpins denoting continuation |
||||||||||||||
b. 22-23
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 4, Prelude in E minor
..
The missing dashes marking the range of smorzando is an inaccuracy of FE (→EE) and GE, quite frequent in Chopinesque first editions. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in GE , Inaccuracies in FC |