The high position of the L.H. chords and the resulting lack of space between the staves contributed to inaccuracies and mistakes in the reproduction of the 
hairpin – it was moved in FC (→GE, inaccurately) and overlooked in FE (→EE1). The mark in EE2 was added on the basis of GE1, overlooking its ending at the beginning of b. 18. In GE, there is a complete mark at the end of the line (in b. 17), in spite of the fact that b. 18 contains its ending in the form of a new mark – in times of Chopin, the contemporary, more accurate notation of such divided hairpins was not generally used yet. The absence of the mark in CGS is one of the arguments supporting the fact that the copy was prepared on the basis of FE.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources
issues: Errors in FE, Scope of dynamic hairpins, Inaccuracies in FC, Hairpins denoting continuation
notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins