![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Annotations in FEJ
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 4, Prelude in E minor
..
In three out of four teaching copies, we find identical Chopinesque entries, indicating a swap of fingers on the c1 note (from 1st to 2nd). The entry in FED is clearest, whereas the one in FEJ – most difficult to read. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , Annotations in FES , Annotations in FEJ |
|||||
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 4, Prelude in E minor
..
As a whole, the entry in FEJ is difficult to interpret. The part written on the stave creates a quite distinct, small, slashed f As far as the marks added below the stave are concerned, they can be seen as, e.g. a diagonal cross (often encountered in teaching copies), a very stooped category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Authentic post-publication changes and variants , Annotations in FEJ |