Slurs
b. 3-4
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 3, Prelude in G major
..
The longer slur of FC (→GE) resulted from a mistake of the copyist, most probably confused by the contour of a fragment of the slur written on the back of this page (over b. 22) blending into the slur of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , Errors of FC |
|||||
b. 4-14
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 3, Prelude in G major
..
In FCI the slurring of the motif in b. 4-6 and 13-15 shows its microstructure as a combination of two motifs of ornamental origin:
In essence, the entire phrase could be written down as follows (the rhythmic values are halved): . category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
|||||
b. 7-10
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 3, Prelude in G major
..
An earlier version of slurring linked to the initial rhythm – see the note on rhythm. It is also there that we discuss the mistakes in the reproduction of the slurs of A, committed both in FC (→GE) and FE (→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in FE , Errors of FC |
|||||
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 3, Prelude in G major
..
In the final version the slur of FCI lost its sense due to the individual elements of the phrase having been separated with rests. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
|||||
b. 18-19
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 3, Prelude in G major
..
In FCI the slur reaches only the beginning of b. 18, which in this context is practically tantamount to the longer slur featured in the remaining sources. category imprint: Differences between sources |