![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Verbal indications
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »
b. 27-30
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 3, Prelude in G major
..
Instead of category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
||||||||
b. 31
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 3, Prelude in G major
..
It remains unclear how the copyist could have distorted the dynamic indication – after all, the indication in A is absolutely legible. Perhaps Fontana, who copied an earlier version of the Prelude, featuring cresc. in this place, remembered that indication and entered it into FC, not having noticed that Chopin changed the dynamic concept of the ending in the meantime. Anyway, nothing indicates that Chopin would have liked to return to the initial dynamic version. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors of FC |
||||||||
b. 32
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 3, Prelude in G major
..
In the version prepared for print, Chopin considered the dynamic indications of the final chords to be superfluous. Cf. the notes in b. 27 and 31. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »