data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
EE1
compare
It seems that the dynamic markings modelling the figuration were not accidentally overlooked by Chopin in A; it was rather a conscious decision related to the general change of concept of the Prelude – see the note on the tempo indication. Chopin would often cross out such marks in autographs, e.g. in the Scherzo in B Minor, Op. 31, b. 334-349.
The same applies to the markings in b. 3-4 and 7 and 9.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins