Page: 
Source: 
p. 1, b. 1-27
p. 1, b. 1-27
p. 2, b. 28-57
p. 3, b. 58-87
p. 4, b. 88-117
p. 5, b. 118-147
p. 6, b. 148-178
p. 7, b. 179-208
p. 8, b. 209-239
p. 9, b. 240-270
Main text
Main text
A - Autograph
FC3 - Third Fontana's Copy
FE - French Edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - Dubois copy
GE - German Edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Fourth German edition
EE - First English edition
IE - First Italian edition
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
FC3 - Third Fontana's Copy
FE - French Edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - Dubois copy
GE - German Edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Fourth German edition
EE - First English edition
IE - First Italian edition
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 25

 

 

 

 

Given that there is g in both the previous and following bars, we are led to believe tha the internal note of the chord in the second half of b. 25 per Chopin’s intention should also be g, and its omission must have been Chopin’s oversight. The version with g is no less satisfactory in musical terms, so if we assume there is no error in Chopin’s notation, we have proposed it for the main text.

Learn more »

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information

issues: GE revisions, Omission of current key accidentals

notation: Pitch