Page: 
Source: 
p. 9, b. 156-179
p. 1
p. 2
p. 3, b. 1-27
p. 4, b. 28-55
p. 5, b. 56-83
p. 6, b. 84-107
p. 7, b. 108-131
p. 8, b. 132-155
p. 9, b. 156-179
p. 10, b. 180-202
p. 11, b. 203-226
p. 12, b. 227-247
p. 13, b. 248-270
p. 14
GE2 - Second German edition
Main text
A - Autograph
FC3 - Third Fontana's Copy
FE - French Edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - Dubois copy
GE - German Edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Fourth German edition
EE - First English edition
IE - First Italian edition
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
FC3 - Third Fontana's Copy
FE - French Edition
FE1 - First French edition
FED - Dubois copy
GE - German Edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Fourth German edition
EE - First English edition
IE - First Italian edition
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF GE2 - Second German edition


  b. 160-163

 

 

 

 

In the sources bars 160 - 163 are slurred differently. The FE (-IEvariant and EE may result from the imprecise notation of FC3.

The GE must be a free interpretation, and yet here we also find differences - in the first three impressions there are only two slurs on the two beats of b. 161. Only in GE4 a slur on the second beat of b. 160 and a slur on bars 162-163 were added. 

 

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions, FE revisions

notation: Slurs