data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
In the sources bars 160 - 163 are slurred differently. The FE (-IE) variant and EE may result from the imprecise notation of FC3.
The GE must be a free interpretation, and yet here we also find differences - in the first three impressions there are only two slurs on the two beats of b. 161. Only in GE4 a slur on the second beat of b. 160 and a slur on bars 162-163 were added.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: GE revisions, FE revisions
notation: Slurs