data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
A
compare
The range of cresc. having been extended until the very end of b. 23 in FC (→GE) is a mistake of the copyist, who led the dashes marking its range to the end of the line, just like in A; however, he did not realize that the end of the line is placed differently in each of the manuscripts – in A in b. 21, whereas in FC – in b. 23.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Errors of FC
notation: Verbal indications