Page: 
Source: 
p. 1, b. 1-20
p. 1, b. 1-20
p. 2, b. 21-47
p. 3, b. 48-64
Main text
Main text
A1 - Working autograph
CJ - Jędrzejewicz Copy
CK - Kolberg Copy
CB - Balakirev Copy
EL - First edition
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A1 - Working autograph
CJ - Jędrzejewicz Copy
CK - Kolberg Copy
CB - Balakirev Copy
EL - First edition
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 6

No indication in A1 & CB

lega. in CJ

leg. in CK

legg. in EL

legato suggested by the editors

By the end of b. 6 both sources based on [A2] – CJ and CK – convey an abbreviation of an indication, which, taking into account the context, we decipher as legato. (IJ features agit., which must be a mistake, yet it confirms that the Chopinesque entry in [A2] was probably indistinct.) In EL the generally uncommon abbreviation leg. was replaced by legg., which must be a mistake. In the main text we move this indication, referring to the accompaniment figures that are not encompassed with slurs, to the beginning of the bar, where first such figures appear.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Revisions in EL

notation: Verbal indications

Missing markers on sources: A1, CJ, CK, CB, EL