Verbal indications
b. 1
|
composition: WN 37, Lento con gran espressione
..
in A1 is one of the three only verbal indications in b. 1-20 (along with con forza in b. 15 and in b. 18). The number of other dynamic markings is also significantly lower – see b. 6-7. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of JC , Revisions in EL |
||||||||||||
b. 1
|
composition: WN 37, Lento con gran espressione
..
In A1, which is of working nature, Chopin had not determined the piece's tempo or mood yet. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Revisions in EL |
||||||||||||
b. 6
|
composition: WN 37, Lento con gran espressione
..
By the end of b. 6 both sources based on [A2] – CJ and CK – convey an abbreviation of an indication, which, taking into account the context, we decipher as legato. (IJ features agit., which must be a mistake, yet it confirms that the Chopinesque entry in [A2] was probably indistinct.) In EL the generally uncommon abbreviation leg. was replaced by legg., which must be a mistake. In the main text we move this indication, referring to the accompaniment figures that are not encompassed with slurs, to the beginning of the bar, where first such figures appear. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Revisions in EL |
||||||||||||
b. 14
|
composition: WN 37, Lento con gran espressione
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
||||||||||||
b. 18
|
composition: WN 37, Lento con gran espressione
..
In the main text we give the indication con forza, which in [A2] (→CJ) most probably replaced the previous mark. The absence of con forza in CK (→CB) and EL is probably Kolberg's oversight, who also overlooked the hairpin here. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |