Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 20

composition: WN 37, Lento con gran espressione

e-B slur in A1, literal reading

No slur in CJ & EL

d-c slur in CK, literal reading

Whole-bar slur in CB

g-B slur suggested by the editors

..

The slurs in A1 and CK are placed negligently, and – particularly in the case of CK – there may be a doubt whether it was not a longer slur that was meant by Chopin. According to us, there are three musically justified versions – literal interpretation of A1, bar-long slur of CB and the intermediate version we suggest. The latter is a compromise between the shorter slurs of A1 and [A2] (→CK) and the most natural slur of CB, as far as the articulation is concerned.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A

b. 21-31

composition: WN 37, Lento con gran espressione

Polymetry in A1

No polymetry in CJ, CK (→CB) & EL

..

In b. 21-22, 25-26 and 30-32 in A1, the R.H. part is in 3/4 time signature, whereas in the L.H. part the regular quaver accompaniment continues in  time signature (two R.H. bars correspond to one L.H. bar). We number the bars after the L.H. part. After b. 21 and 25, where the endings of the bars coincide, Chopin marked this synchronisation with a vertical, dotted line, combining the bar lines on both staves. In our transcription we reproduce these lines as dashed and add them also after b. 30-31. This is the only example of polymeter in Chopin's music. An analogous difference is present also in the 1st half of b. 32, which we discuss separately. 

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

b. 21

composition: WN 37, Lento con gran espressione

 in A1

 in CJ, CK (→CB) & EL

..

The extreme nature of  clearly suggests the unique atmosphere of the fragment that starts here, which echoes the Concerto in F Minor and the song "The Wish".

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

b. 21-24

composition: WN 37, Lento con gran espressione

3 slurs in bars 22 & 24 in A1, literal reading

w slurs in bars 22 & 24 in A1, contextual interpretation

Supplemented A1 slurs, our alternative suggestion

No slurs in CJ, CK & EL

8 slurs in CB

[legato] suggested by the editors

..

In the fragment (b. 21-32) that starts here we can encounter a few L.H. slurs marked in a draft manner in A1 – two slurs in b. 22 and one in b. 24. It is only the latter that encompasses an entire four-quaver figure; however, it seems that both earlier ones, although much shorter, bear the same meaning. According to us, Chopin wrote these slurs only just the second time, since the first time (b. 21 and 23) he focused on writing new accompaniment figures correctly. There is no doubt that all bars are to be performed similarly, which leads to our alternative suggestion to add slurs. Since [A] (→CJ,CK) does not feature any slurs in these bars, in the main text we suggest repeating the indication legato, used in b. 6-7, instead.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , Balakirev's revisions

b. 21

composition: WN 37, Lento con gran espressione

No markings in A1

     in CJ

     in CK

     in CB & EL

..

The pedalling markings are featured only in the sources coming from [A2]. In both copies based directly on the autograph, the second  mark is written only just under the 4th beat of the bar, which is rather a patent inaccuracy, corrected both in CB and EL. We introduce this correction also in the main text. CJ is devoid of the second  mark.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: No pedal release mark , Inaccuracies in JC