data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
CK
compare
In the main text we give the indication con forza, which in [A2] (→CJ) most probably replaced the previous mark. The absence of con forza in CK (→CB) and EL is probably Kolberg's oversight, who also overlooked the
hairpin here.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations
notation: Verbal indications