![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors repeated in EE
b. 6
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
Both autographs are lacking in the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE , Last key signature sign , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||||
b. 94-96
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
AI and AF (→FE→EE) are lacking in the sharps restoring f category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||||
b. 134
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
It is difficult to say which version of the 1st beat of the bar is later and whether Chopin considered any of them to be final. According to us, when the G In FE (→EE) this G category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors of A , Accompaniment changes , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||||
b. 134-135
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In FE (→EE) the slur over the L.H. part starts already from the 1st crotchet in b. 134. It must be a result of misinterpretation of the notation of AF, in which the slur over the three chords encompasses them with plenty of margin. Moreover, in FE this slur reaches only the 3rd crotchet in b. 134, in spite of the fact that its ending is present in b. 135 – on a new line. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Uncertain slur continuation , Errors repeated in EE |