Issues : Authentic corrections of FE
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 149-151
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In b. 149 and 151 the autographs are devoid of cautionary accidentals. In the first stage of proofreading of FE (→EE) a was added before b in b. 151; the accidental is also present in GE. In the second stage of proofreading of FE a before b was also added in b. 149; moreover, a was repeated before the R.H. b note on the 3rd beat of the bar. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Cautionary accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE , FE revisions |
||||||||
b. 153
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
The indication was added in FE in the last stage of proofreading. Without [AG] it is difficult to say whether the same was true of GE or whether Chopin wrote it already in the aforementioned autograph. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 168
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
Just like in analogous b. 160, in the main text we reproduce the mark of AF. The long accent in FE may result from Chopin's proofreading, which is indicated by the fact that EE does not contain any mark. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Long accents , Scope of dynamic hairpins , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 187
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
The indication slentando must be a Chopinesque addition introduced in the last stage of proofreading of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »