b. 165-168
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
Just like in b. 157-160, two L.H. slurs are almost certainly an improvement introduced into [AG] (→GE). category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
||||||||
b. 165
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
From b. 158 on we give the dynamic indications of AF – see the note to b. 158-161. Due to this reason, in the main text we suggest , which is compliant with the indications of AF, yet present in GE, in a variant form. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions |
||||||||
b. 165
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
AI and AF are lacking in the lowering d to d. The patent inaccuracy was corrected in FE (→EE); it is also GE that features the correct text. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||||
b. 166-169
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
Just like in b. 158-161, in the main text we give the version of AF (→FE→EE), in which a continuous cresc. starts only just in the second half of the eight-bar section. The version of GE, also undoubtedly authentic, can be considered an equal variant. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
||||||||
b. 166
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we give the simplified – most probably by Chopin in [AG] – notation of GE. The only perceptible difference affecting the performance is the rhythmic value of the f1 note in the chord on the 2nd quaver of the bar. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Chopin's hesitations , Corrections of AI |