Issues : Errors in EE
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »
b. 68-69
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In AI the ending of the slur in b. 68 (at the end of the line) suggests continuation; however, a flat slur begins in the new line from the 1st note of b. 69, in which one can see either a continuation of the preceding one or a new slur. The beginning of the slur in b. 69 in AF is also unclear – a flat line gradually emerges over the b1 minim, hence one can assume that Chopin started writing it earlier. The slurs of FE were probably corrected from a continuous slur, and, although the final notation is imprecise, the division of the slur between the bars is unquestionable. The same slurs are included in GE1, and this is the version we give in the main text. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions , Uncertain slur continuation |
||||||||||||
b. 111-116
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we include the staccato dots under the bass notes in b. 112, 115 and 116 on the basis of AF (→FE). As an alternative solution, we suggest taking into account the dot of GE1 in b. 111 too. The omission of some of the dots in EE and GE2 is an oversight of the engravers. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Errors in GE |
||||||||||||
b. 120-122
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we follow the marks of GE, in which the markings are more accurate in this fragment (pedalling in b. 117-121, in b. 119). The only element we modify is the ending of the mark, since b. 121 closes a line in this edition; therefore, even if the notation of [AG] resembled the one of AF, the engraver could have considered the placement of a very short ending of a hairpin in a new line to be irrational. The version of AF (→FE) can be considered an equal variant. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , Errors in EE |
||||||||||||
b. 148-152
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
AI is devoid of slurs in these bars, which is most probably Chopin's inadvertence – see b. 141-143. The missing slurs in b. 149-150 in EE is a mistake of the engraver of FE (corrected in the finished FE) or EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||||||
b. 170
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
The last R.H. bottom voice crotchet in EE is a1, which is a mistake. It was most probably EE in which this patent Terzverschreibung was committed, since FE does not reveal traces of corrections in this place. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Terzverschreibung error |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »