![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Scope of dynamic hairpins
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 76-77
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we give the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Scope of dynamic hairpins |
||||||||||||
b. 90-92
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we give the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins |
||||||||||||
b. 100-101
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
A comparison with other sources, as well as with the notation of both autographs in analogous b. 8-9, suggests that the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , Authentic corrections of FE , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||||||||
b. 117-118
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
It is the top arm of the category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins |
||||||||||||
b. 120-122
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we follow the marks of GE, in which the markings are more accurate in this fragment (pedalling in b. 117-121, category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , Errors in EE |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »