![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Authentic corrections of FE
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 75-76
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
The missing category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions; Corrections & alterations |
||||||||||||||
b. 89-93
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
The category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||||||||
b. 100-101
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
A comparison with other sources, as well as with the notation of both autographs in analogous b. 8-9, suggests that the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , Authentic corrections of FE , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||||||||||
b. 109
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
The accent in AF is quite short in this bar, hence it is its shape and context that make us consider it a long accent. The presence of a significantly longer mark in FE (→EE) – such as in analogous b. 17 – points to a possible intervention of a reviser or perhaps Chopin himself. A change performed on Chopin's order would confirm the mark to be a long accent. The mark in GE1 was placed inaccurately, so it is not entirely certain which beat of the bar it concerns. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||||||||
b. 115
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
The two accents written in AF in analogous b. 19 and 111 have the characteristics that are frequently encountered in the notation of short accents – the mark tilted upwards and a relatively big angle between the arms. However, the mark in the discussed bar is less characteristic in this respect; therefore, we assume that it is a long accent. In FE (→EE) it was placed under the L.H. chord by mistake, which Chopin then corrected in the last stage of proofreading by adding a second accent under the R.H. triplet. According to us, the added accent – certainly long – tips the balance in favour of long accents in all analogous bars. The short accent in GE may be considered an alternative version. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »