Slurs
|
b. 18
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
The missing slur (and the staccato dot – see the adjacent note) must be Chopin's inadvertence in AF – in this autograph, respective marks are in all three analogous b. 22, 110 and 114. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in A |
||||||||
|
b. 18-21
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we include the slurs combining the last chord in b. 18 and 20 with the first note in the next bar. The absence of the slur in b. 20-21 must be Chopin's oversight in AF (→FE→EE). See also b. 22-23. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||||
|
b. 19-20
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
The missing slur must be Chopin's oversight in AF (→FE→EE). The relevant slurs are present in all analogous places. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of A |
||||||||
|
b. 22-23
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
Just like in b. 18-19 and 20-21, in the main text we give the slur added to the version prepared for print – AF and [AG] (→GE). The slur in FE (→EE) was placed on the side of the noteheads, which made it look like a tie of a. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in FE , Placement of markings , Tie or slur |
||||||||
|
b. 24
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In this context the concordant version of the other sources proves the FE (→EE) version to be erroneous. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
