Slurs
|
b. 172
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In AF the slur breaks here; however, it is uncertain whether it was supposed to indicate a division of the slur – one can see it as an inaccurately written combination of the slurs, which is how it was interpreted in FE (→EE). In the main text we give the continuous slur of GE, which almost certainly corresponds to the notation of [AG]. See also the note in the next bar. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A |
||||||||
|
b. 173
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
The slurring of GE, separating the culminant phrase from the course of the preparatory progression, is probably a change introduced by Chopin in [AG] (→GE). category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
||||||||
|
b. 180-188
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
The L.H. slurs in b. 180-182 and 185-188 must be a Chopinesque improvement from [AG] (→GE). Cf. b. 173-176. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
||||||||
|
b. 181
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In AI a new slur starts from the c category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A |
||||||||
|
b. 188-189
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
The missing slur in AF does not seem to be an oversight; it is rather an element of an intermediate performance indications concept between AI and GE, or of an alternative one. In the main text, based on GE, we include the slur. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
1 minim, although ink did not flow from the pen immediately. Therefore, both the continuous slur of 