![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors resulting from corrections
b. 45
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 1, Mazurka in G major
..
In A1 (→FE) there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors resulting from corrections , GE revisions , Errors of A , Errors repeated in FE |
|||||||||
b. 76-77
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 1, Mazurka in G major
..
It is difficult to say whether the absence of the tie of b in GE means that Chopin abandoned the idea of holding that note or whether it is a result of an oversight of the engraver or of Chopin himself. Due to the above reason we suggest a variant solution with the tie in brackets. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions |
|||||||||
b. 84-85
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 1, Mazurka in G major
..
The reason for the omission of the tie of d by FE (→EE) could have been the deletions of A1 at the beginning of b. 85. The fragment of the slur falling on that bar was deleted, and Chopin did not repeat that fragment on the rewritten – on a staff below – 1st beat of the bar. category imprint: Differences between sources |