![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Scope of dynamic hairpins
b. 12-13
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 1, Mazurka in G major
..
According to us, the category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , Scope of dynamic hairpins , Corrections in A , EE inaccuracies , Hairpins denoting continuation , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||||||||||
b. 43-44
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 1, Mazurka in G major
..
In the main text we include the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Scope of dynamic hairpins |
|||||||||||||
b. 48-49
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 1, Mazurka in G major
..
In the main text we suggest to reconstruct the version of [A2], which could have been distorted in GE1 due to the transition into a new line (after all, it cannot be excluded that it was in the autograph itself that the pair of hairpins was placed directly under the d1 minim). As there are no doubts that the marks are to emphasise this very minim, according to us, one can also combine the category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , Scope of dynamic hairpins , Centrally placed marks |
|||||||||||||
b. 53-54
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 1, Mazurka in G major
..
In the main text we give the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins |
|||||||||||||
b. 55
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 1, Mazurka in G major
..
In the main text we include the category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in FE , Scope of dynamic hairpins |