



Ornaments
b. 4
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 1, Mazurka in G major
..
The arpeggio mark written in A1 before the first chord was overlooked in FE (→EE), yet an arpeggio mark was added before the 2nd chord in the proofreading of FE2. In the main text we include both arpeggios, in accordance with GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 1, Mazurka in G major
..
Both manners of writing an arpeggio with a doubled bottom note mean the same performance and both were used by Chopin (the combination used in GE appears in A1 in b. 80 as well as in, e.g. the autograph of Allegro de Concert, Op. 46, b. 138-139, 232, 236). In the main text we give the notation of the principal source, i.e. GE1. The remaining versions are erroneous: in FE1 the vertical little slur of A1 was not recognised as an arpeggio, whereas in FE2 and GE2 the marks were overlooked. There is a similar situation in b. 36 and 68. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in GE |
|||||||||||
b. 28
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 1, Mazurka in G major
category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||
b. 36
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 1, Mazurka in G major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||||||||
b. 60
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 1, Mazurka in G major
..
The arpeggios before both chords come from GE, in which they were most probably repeated after [A2]. The absence of the former in FE (→EE) is an oversight of the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |