In the main text we suggest to reconstruct the version of [A2], which could have been distorted in GE1 due to the transition into a new line (after all, it cannot be excluded that it was in the autograph itself that the pair of hairpins was placed directly under the d1 minim). As there are no doubts that the marks are to emphasise this very minim, according to us, one can also combine the of GE1 with the accent of A1. The versions of FE (→EE) and GE2 result from inaccuracies and mistakes of the engravers.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions
issues: Long accents, Inaccuracies in GE, Inaccuracies in FE, Scope of dynamic hairpins, Centrally placed marks
notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins