|
b. 30-31
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 1, Mazurka in G major
..
The ending of the slur over b. 30-31 is uncertain in A1: at the end of the line, in b. 30, the slur suggests continuation, yet there is no ending thereof in b. 31. A comparison with the slur in b. 26-27, extended by Chopin, proves that it is the missing ending of the slur in b. 31 that is a mistake. Such interpreted slurs are featured in FE2, which may be a result of Chopin's proofreading, since FE1 considered the slur in b. 30 to be inaccurate and shortened it correspondingly. In the main text we give the unquestionable four-bar slur of GE1, reflecting [A2] (in GE2 it was reproduced inaccurately: in b. 30, which ends the page, the slur reaches the minim only; see also b. 65-66). category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccurate slurs in A , Authentic corrections of FE , Uncertain slur continuation |
|||||||||
|
b. 30-34
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 1, Mazurka in G major
..
The missing accents on the syncopated minims in b. 30 and 34 must be considered Chopin's inadvertence in A1 (→FE→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||
|
b. 33
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 1, Mazurka in G major
..
Just like in b. 29, the missing pedalling markings – this time in GE – must be considered inadvertence. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||
|
b. 33
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 1, Mazurka in G major
category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||
|
b. 35
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 1, Mazurka in G major
..
Just like in the previous analogous places, in the main text we give the slurring of GE based on [A2]. category imprint: Differences between sources |
in 
