Issues : EE revisions
|
b. 397
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The dotted g category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omitted correction of an analogous place |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
b. 400
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In all editions except for GE2 the whole-bar rest was specified with the digit 1, one (FE and GE3) or both GE1 and EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , FE revisions |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
b. 413-435
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The accents written in A in b. 413, 415 and analog. mean almost certainly the same despite differences, generally minor ones, in length and shape. The majority of the marks is rather short; however, four (b. 417, 425, 433 and 435) are definitely long, which makes us provide the main text with long accents only. At the same time, we add the accents Chopin overlooked in b. 419 and 431. We consider the version of GE2 (→GE3) with a complete set of short accents to be an alternative solution. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in FC |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
b. 418
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
b. 435
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The version of EE2 (→EE3) is an arbitrary revision, perhaps aimed at avoiding a flagrant (?) succession and harmony of a minor ninth, d category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
in 
before d2. The mark was added already in 
