Verbal indications
|
b. 664-665
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
According to Chopin, these bars were supposed to be an exact repetition of b. 213-214. Therefore, in the main text we give the dolce indication in b. 664, in accordance with the Chopinesque entry in b. 213 in FC (→GE1). In subsequent GE the indication was arbitrarily moved to b. 665, probably by analogy with b. 81-82. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 692-707
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we give the indication cresc. - - - written by Chopin in FC (see the note to b. 65-66) The composer added crescendo in this fragment also in the proofreading of FE (→EE); however, he began it a bar later. That version, most probably later, can be considered equivalent. GE1 reproduced the indication of FC inaccurately, since from b. 697 it overlooked the dashes marking the range of cresc. That oversight was corrected in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Authentic corrections of FC |
|||||||||
|
b. 708
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we give the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Authentic corrections of FE , Authentic corrections of FC |
|||||||||
|
b. 725-731
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The missing dashes marking the range of cresc. are an inaccuracy of FE (→EE) and GE1. Omission of such dashes is a quite frequent discretion of Chopinesque first editions. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 736
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A |
in 
