Issues : Errors in FE
b. 227-228
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
Like in b. 95-96, none of the secondary sources repeated the slur over the b-a motif that Chopin entered into A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors of FC |
||||||||
b. 249
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The missing dots at the beginning of the bar (in both hands) is almost certainly an oversight of the engraver of FE (→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||
b. 265-267
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The version of FE (→EE) is almost certainly erroneous:
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Sign reversal , Partial corrections |
||||||||
b. 265-266
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
According to us, the slurs combining e with f and e1 with f1 are a result of a mistake of the engraver of FE, who placed them to the left-hand side of the chord in b. 266, whereas they should be ties, placed to the right-hand side of the chord. It is supported by the following arguments:
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Sign reversal , Partial corrections |
||||||||
b. 267-268
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In FE b. 267 closes the line of the text. There are no ties of the R.H. minims, f-f1, therein, whereas in b. 268 it is only the tie of f that was finished. These are patent mistakes. EE ignored that partial tie while adding a tie of f1, probably on the basis of comparison with an analogous place in b. 271-272, where FE has only the tie of f1. All necessary ties in the discussed bars were added in FESf. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Annotations in FESf |