data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
In FE b. 267 closes the line of the text. There are no ties of the R.H. minims, f-f
1, therein, whereas in b. 268 it is only the tie of f
that was finished. These are patent mistakes. EE ignored that partial tie while adding a tie of f
1, probably on the basis of comparison with an analogous place in b. 271-272, where FE has only the tie of f
1. All necessary ties in the discussed bars were added in FESf.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Annotations in teaching copies, EE revisions, Errors in FE, Annotations in FESf
notation: Rhythm