



Issues : Errors in FE
b. 521
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
FE overlooked the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Annotations in FED , Annotations in FESf |
|||||||||
b. 527
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In A the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Deletions in A |
|||||||||
b. 533-534
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Annotations in FED |
|||||||||
b. 540-543
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we give the pedalling of A, the only irrefutably authentic. The missing pedalling in FC (→GE) may be a result of an oversight of the copyist: overlooked slurs suggest distraction. It is also likely that Chopin added it in A after having prepared FC. The missing category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions , No pedal release mark , Errors of FC |
|||||||||
b. 544
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The missing staccato dot in FE and GE1 must be a result of the engravers' oversights (the engraver of GE1 can be excused, since it is difficult to identify the mark in FC). The accent added in GE2 (→GE3) by analogy with the next bars is an arbitrary revision. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in GE , GE revisions |