FC
compare
b. 621-622
The missing must be an inaccuracy of notation, since corresponding marks – or – are in all 11 analogous places. On the basis of an analysis of those marks (see b. 6-7), in the main text we give an averaged, more or less one-bar hairpin. According to us, all signs, regardless of their actual length, are to be interpreted as long accents.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions
issues: GE revisions
notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins