The interpretation of the notation of A is problematic here: b. 30 ends the line, and the 
mark goes far beyond the bar line (in b. 31 there is already no mark). We assume that it is a one-and-a-half-bar mark, like in GE2 (→GE3). In the main text, in accordance with the analysis of the Chopinesque or 
marks in this and analog. pairs of bars (see b. 6-7), we give here an averaged, more or less one-bar hairpin of EE. According to us, all marks, regardless of their actual length, should be interpreted here as long accents.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions
issues: Long accents, EE revisions, Inaccuracies in FE, Scope of dynamic hairpins, GE revisions, Inaccuracies in FC
notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins