|
b. 49-58
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In b. 49-50 and 57-58 in the main text we give the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FC |
|||||
|
b. 49-52
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The range of the slur limited in FC (→GE1) to quavers only is an inaccuracy of the copyist. In GE2 (→GE3) the slur was extended after analog. b. 181-184. See also b. 57-58. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Inaccuracies in FC |
|||||
|
b. 53-54
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The slur of A does not go beyond the bar line, which must be an inaccuracy – cf. similar motifs in b. 55-56, 61-62, 62-63 (L.H.) and 63-64. In the main text we give the slur extended by Chopin in FC (→GE). category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
|||||
|
b. 54-56
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The staccato dot, written in b. 54 in A (→FE→EE), was crossed out in FC, almost certainly by Chopin. It is demonstrated by another small correction visible in this place – dragging the slur from b. 53 to the quaver in b. 54. Taking into account the above, we do not include this dot in the main text. See also analog. b. 186-196. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FC |
|||||
|
b. 55-56
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In these bars in FED one can notice vague pencilled lines; such lines may be encountered in Chopinesque pupils' copies. They may have accompanied some verbal indications of the Master, yet it is generally impossible to guess their meaning. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Source & stylistic information |
in 
