![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Sign reversal
b. 57
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
Reversed marks are quite frequent mistakes – cf. e.g. the 2nd mov. of the Concerto, bar 47 or the Etude in C Minor, Op. 10 No. 12, bar 53. In GE3, the mark was omitted, probably due to inattention – see the next note. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Sign reversal |
|||||||||||||
b. 72-73
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In FE (→EE), the reversed accent is probably a mistake of the engraver, which is indicated by the common accent in analogous bar 300. Therefore, in the main text we give an accent both in this and in the next bar, like Chopin marked it in bars 300-301. There is also a possibility that the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , Sign reversal |