mUltimate Chopin

Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

Text Compare Notes Sources Description

Issues : GE revisions

b. 105-107

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

No signs in FE (→EE,GE1→GE2)

Slurs in GE3
..

In GE3, slurs over the three-note motifs in the top voice of the R.H. and the L.H. were arbitrarily added in bars 105 and 107 (three subsequent semiquavers in the R.H. were provided with staccato dots).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 105-107

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

No marks in FE (→EE,GE1→GE2)

Staccato dots in GE3
..

As part of an arbitrary clarification of articulation, GE3 provided the repeated semiquavers in bars 105 and 107 with staccato marks.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 108-109

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

Dots on 2nd quavers in FE (→EE,GE1→GE2)

Dots on pairs of quavers in GE3
..

It does not appear that the missing staccato dots over the first chords in these bars could have been attributed to Chopin's inattention. Therefore, the marks added in GE3 most probably do not correspond to his intention.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 108-109

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

No marks in FE (→EE,GE1→GE2)

L.H. staccato dots in GE3
..

Staccato indicated in GE3 for all octaves in the L.H. must be an arbitrary action of the reviser of that edition.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 110-111

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

No markings in FE (→EE,GE1→GE2)

Dots & slur in GE3
..

GE3 arbitrarily marked articulation of all semiquavers – the majority – staccato, two – legato.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions