Issues : EE revisions
|
b. 441
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In spite of the fact that the fingerings indicated in FED and EE concern the same figure, they are independent – each of them can be completed so that it complies with each other or differently. However, it is most convenient to continue the fingering of FED copied in the 1st half of the bar with the one marked by Fontana, whereas the fingering of EE can be easily combined also with other combinations of fingers in the 1st half of the bar (e.g. 2124). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FED |
||||||||
|
b. 441
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 448-449
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The absence of the slur in the L.H. is one of a few defects of this type in FE; in this case, it probably stems from the gap caused by the change of clef. The slur was added in EE and GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 450
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In FE, the second quaver in the R.H. is inaccurately printed – the notehead is actually at the pitch of e3, yet it is missing the ledger line that crosses it, as a result of which it can be interpreted as a d category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors repeated in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 452-453
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
3 in 
