Issues : Authentic corrections of FE
b. 124
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The missing dots in GE may be merely an oversight; however, it cannot be ruled out that the marks were added in the last proofreading of FE – see the note on the slur. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 124-126
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The slur in FE was added probably in the last phase of proofreading; hence it is absent in GE1 (→GE2). It is indicated by the shape of the slur, adjusted to the already existing elements of notation with difficulty. The slur was added in GE3 (also in the L.H.). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 133-137
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
Precise slurring of this section (bars 128-143) is a result of Chopin's proofreading, whose traces are visible in FE in bars 133, 136 and 137 – the original slurs reached only just the fourth last semiquaver. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 148
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
GE is missing the cautionary before b1, which probably means that it was added in the last phase of proofreading of FE, perhaps by Chopin. Cf. bar 156. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 156-158
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The cautionary naturals before the E-e octave in the middle of bar 156 are to be found only in FE (→EE), which points to a possible proofreading performed by Chopin in the last stage of preparation of FE. In the main text, we add analogous naturals also in bar 158; they were added also in EE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |