Issues : EE revisions
|
b. 382
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In the R.H. part, FE has only two naturals in the first semiquaver triplet. This inaccuracy, typical of Chopin, was corrected in the remaining editions – GE1 (→GE2) added a category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |
|||||||||
|
b. 384-385
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The missing ties of the e2-e3 octave are most probably an oversight – cf. the analogous motifs in bars 381 and 383. Due to this reason, we suggest ties of this octave in the main text. Relevant additions were performed already in EE and GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 384-385
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The missing continuation of the slur in the further part of the passage in the L.H. is most probably an inaccuracy, caused by difficulties in drawing or reproducing the slur encompassing the topmost semiquavers, written by Chopin under the R.H. on the bottom stave. Various additions to the slur of FE (→EE1,GE1→GE2) were proposed in EE2 (→EE3) and GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 386
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 386
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
before the penultimate semiquaver of the bar, while 
