|
b. 112
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 113-114
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
A possible oversight of the tie of g category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 113
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text, we add a staccato dot over the 2nd quaver in the R.H. after the dots in analogous bars 108-109 and 112. Omission of the mark in the fourth and last appearance of the motif must be considered an inaccuracy. Staccato marks (wedges) are present over the respective notes in bars 112 and 113 in violin I in FEorch (→GEorch). As part of numerous additions of articulation marks in this Tutti, a dot was added also in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 114
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The slurs of GE3 are an arbitrary addition of the revision, most probably under the influence of the slurs combining the next pair of quavers. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 115
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The slur added in GE, although most probably inauthentic, is, however, justified – an identical motif in the next bar is encompassed with a slur, a three-note slur is also present in both parts of violins in FEorch (→GEorch). In the main text, we do not interfere with the notation of FE (→EE), but we alternatively suggest a slur of such a range. The placement of the slurs is discussed in the next note. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
2 repeated in 
