Issues : GE revisions
|
b. 120-122
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The added slur in the L.H. is obviously musically justified. However, in the main text we keep the original notation, since Chopin used both notations in similar contexts – with a slur only over the R.H., valid by default also for the L.H., or with separate slurs for both hands. Both EE and GE3 added a slur corresponding to the slur in the R.H. – in EE to the end of bar 121, and in GE3 to e3. The slur in EE begins only just in bar 121 (on a new line); however, its beginning points to continuation from the previous bar. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 122
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The missing wedges at the beginning of the bar are most probably an oversight of the engraver of GE1 (→GE2). The marks were added in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 124-126
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The slur in FE was added probably in the last phase of proofreading; hence it is absent in GE1 (→GE2). It is indicated by the shape of the slur, adjusted to the already existing elements of notation with difficulty. The slur was added in GE3 (also in the L.H.). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 124-126
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 126-127
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
It is difficult to determine how come that the correct text of GE2 (excluding the mistake in the 1st quaver in bar 127, discussed separately) was changed to the impoverished version of GE2a. Perhaps a worn-out fragment of a plate was re-engraved in order to remove the increasingly pronounced printing defects. Traces of such procedures are to be found, e.g. in the Concerto in F Minor, Op. 21 – see the characterization of its GE1a. It also happened that various mistakes were committed in a newly engraved text, most frequently, precisely, oversights. However, in the discussed place printing defects are visible rather on the available copies of GE2a; hence after possible corrections (cf. e.g. the copy from the National Library in Warsaw). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors resulting from corrections , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
