data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
In the main text, we interpret four marks in these bars as long accents. Thus, we demonstrate the difference in indications with respect to analogous bars 100-103, in which similar marks are clearly longer and separated with repeated
indications. After all, it is highly likely that different lengths of marks in [A] were not so regular or meaningful, since the Chopinesque
hairpin, unless preceded with a
mark, generally also indicates an accent. According to us, Chopin most probably meant both fragments to be performed in the same manner.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions
issues: Long accents
notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins