In FE, the missing slur is most probably an oversight related to the introduction of bass clef to the notation of f
. Anyway, it must be an inaccuracy, which was corrected already in GE and EE.
Distraction of the engraver of FE is proved also by the missing initial fragment of the next slur – it is only its ending in bar 208, on a new line, that was printed.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: EE revisions, Inaccuracies in FE, GE revisions, Uncertain slur continuation
notation: Slurs
