The version of EE is erroneous – cf. analogous bar 359; the mistake was probably caused by the similarity of subsequent triplets. In FEH, an annotation in the form of 'ut,' i.e. c, was written next to that note, which can be interpreted as a note that it is not an e.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information
issues: Annotations in teaching copies, Errors in EE, Terzverschreibung error, Annotations in FEH
notation: Pitch
